基道? 人道?
美國動保協會花了3年的時間調查雞肉與牛肉供應商是否
作到他們宣稱的:所有的動物都是以合乎環保與友善人道的方式
飼養,而在他們貨品得說明只有簡短得句子說: 以合適的方法飼養,
供應商一直無法提出證據證明與他們的宣傳的說法一致. (好比
台灣前一陣子只能對廠商已宣傳不實懲處)這與台灣前一陣子對
肉品上的000認證問題一樣,
(煥句說: 美國的月亮與台灣的月亮是同一個)
http://time.com/99296/80-of-meat-labels-could-be-meaningless-exclusive-report-says/
The findings suggest that whether or not the animals in question are actually being raised humanely or in an eco-friendly manner, there are big gaps in verifying those claims and giving consumers access to that information. “We’re not suggesting that all these claims are misleading or that the claims we reviewed were misused,” says Dena Jones, manager of AWI’s Farm Animal Program. “But that’s the problem—we don’t know,” she notes. “That doesn’t give any assurance to the consumer.”
In the five cases in which AWI did receive relevant documents about labeling claims, the evidence, in Jones’s opinion, was inadequate, often consisting of a one- or two-sentence statement by the company that the animals were being raised appropriately—and no additional information about animal cage size, feed or water quality.
留言列表
